|
|
 | | Re: "Is he seriously thinking it's going to work?"
|
| Aren't lobsters black *before* you boil[1] them? That would explain a lot... Johnny Thunder has a lobster towing his raft! The only problem is... Lobsters do not live in fresh water. Maybe it is a really big freshwater shrimp? (...) [1] We can have (...) (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: next year
|
| (...) Unfortunately I'm afraid the Adventurers line has burned itself out--perhaps not in our eyes, but in the eyes of TLC. Three years is about the shelf-life of a theme, as far as I've been able to tell, so we shouldn't be surprised if 2000 is the (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.adventurers)
| | | | | Re: Strange Names Indeed
|
| (...) Hm, actually, it's much more disturbing. Sam Sinister, in the US, isn't the Baron (with the hook and pith helmet)--he's the guy in the black suit, red shirt, and black top hat, with round glasses and a fiendish visage. So he's her brother? So (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.adventurers)
| | | | | Re: "Is he seriously thinking it's going to work?"
|
| (...) A lobster? Ye Gods, man, I think you're on to something! Now I have to completely alter the power ratios! (And figure out why they've got erectile tails.) Hmmm...that may explain the trans-orange ones, but then why is the riverine example (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | next year
|
| Forgive me if I am asking something that has already been answered, but after all of the excitement over in the starwars group over next years stuff, I was wondering what next year holds for the Adventurers? I don't think I've yet read anything (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
|
