 | | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) that the flaming about perceived rules breaking is (...) misplaced auction posts has occurred, but there sure has (...) any group so long as they relate to that groups purpose (...) postings). I have not seen too much of this - but I suppose I (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) It may be a function of which groups you hang out in, if you mostly hang out in the market groups (not saying you do), you won't see the chiding (my word for the day) that goes on by vigilantes (yesterday's word) as much. We all like to be (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | (...) and (...) I wholeheartedly agree, and I'm glad someone else is jumping on this bandwagon (I'be been trumpetting this ideal for some time, though I don't think I'm the only one who has trumpetted this). Frank (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Frank Filz writes: <snip> Remember, trim geek unless you were commenting on signature doohickies! ++Lar (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) in (...) and (...) the (...) a (...) Yes. It was only a matter of time before you came around to my way of thinking :-) Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
