 | | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) It hasn't happened yet, no -- partially due to time and partially due to a few borderline examples that happened in April and May which confuse the issue. It's still the intention to adjust the TOU to keep blatant non-auction flogs out of the (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) So how would you "grade" this one? I see it as a big contribution to the theme group and not at all a flog. Eric, I think, sees it rather more like pure flog with little or no redeeming value. Some specific guidance from you, since you're the (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | | | (...) Ah... hmmm. First, as I tried to hint to you earlier, I don't really think that this post was necessarily nothing but a blatant flog. I did think it raised an interesting point to debate, though, because it would be easy to flog in this manner (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) weak (...) but these posts were to different groups. I dunno about you, but my MO is to start reading a group that interests me from where I left off, till I reach the end, then dip into another one. Hence, the order posted, if fairly close (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship —Frank Filz
|
| | | | Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) Also, I assume references to market sites in ones sigs will still be allowed assuming the sig itself is of reasonable size. One thought for Kevin and future posters of something like this, the post would be (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) yet (inserted by Lar) (...) I forgot about that! EXCELLENT point, Frank. Smacks of vigilantism and of enforcing mores that aren't actually in effect (which phenomenon I am quite familiar with, living in Grand Rapids as I do, but I digress). (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship —Frank Filz
|
| | | | Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... (...) I like to keep people honest :-) I sincerely hope that the new TOU get resolved pretty soon. It seems to me that the flaming about perceived rules breaking is getting worse (over the past couple months, I (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) that the flaming about perceived rules breaking is (...) misplaced auction posts has occurred, but there sure has (...) any group so long as they relate to that groups purpose (...) postings). I have not seen too much of this - but I suppose I (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) It may be a function of which groups you hang out in, if you mostly hang out in the market groups (not saying you do), you won't see the chiding (my word for the day) that goes on by vigilantes (yesterday's word) as much. We all like to be (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | (...) and (...) I wholeheartedly agree, and I'm glad someone else is jumping on this bandwagon (I'be been trumpetting this ideal for some time, though I don't think I'm the only one who has trumpetted this). Frank (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Frank Filz writes: <snip> Remember, trim geek unless you were commenting on signature doohickies! ++Lar (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) in (...) and (...) the (...) a (...) Yes. It was only a matter of time before you came around to my way of thinking :-) Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
