 | | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
|
(...) I can see that someone might do this (although I wasn't intending to in this case), and I have mixed feelings about whether or not it would be OK. Including links to sales and auctions in a .sig has always been acceptable, to my understanding. (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
|
(...) It hasn't happened yet, no -- partially due to time and partially due to a few borderline examples that happened in April and May which confuse the issue. It's still the intention to adjust the TOU to keep blatant non-auction flogs out of the (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
|
(...) So how would you "grade" this one? I see it as a big contribution to the theme group and not at all a flog. Eric, I think, sees it rather more like pure flog with little or no redeeming value. Some specific guidance from you, since you're the (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) Also, I assume references to market sites in ones sigs will still be allowed assuming the sig itself is of reasonable size. One thought for Kevin and future posters of something like this, the post would be (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
|
(...) So would I, especially now that we have the skip-filter in place. I think it would encourage people to post their sales in the proper theme market groups, and would let people looking for a specific theme filter those back *in*. For example, I (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
|
(...) Ah... hmmm. First, as I tried to hint to you earlier, I don't really think that this post was necessarily nothing but a blatant flog. I did think it raised an interesting point to debate, though, because it would be easy to flog in this manner (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
|
(...) I agree. And conversely, when I want to buy something, it's generally technic, and would rather not wade through the other stuff. (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
|
(...) yet (inserted by Lar) (...) I forgot about that! EXCELLENT point, Frank. Smacks of vigilantism and of enforcing mores that aren't actually in effect (which phenomenon I am quite familiar with, living in Grand Rapids as I do, but I digress). (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
|
(...) weak (...) but these posts were to different groups. I dunno about you, but my MO is to start reading a group that interests me from where I left off, till I reach the end, then dip into another one. Hence, the order posted, if fairly close (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... (...) I like to keep people honest :-) I sincerely hope that the new TOU get resolved pretty soon. It seems to me that the flaming about perceived rules breaking is getting worse (over the past couple months, I (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
|
(...) that the flaming about perceived rules breaking is (...) misplaced auction posts has occurred, but there sure has (...) any group so long as they relate to that groups purpose (...) postings). I have not seen too much of this - but I suppose I (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
|
(...) It may be a function of which groups you hang out in, if you mostly hang out in the market groups (not saying you do), you won't see the chiding (my word for the day) that goes on by vigilantes (yesterday's word) as much. We all like to be (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
|
(...) and (...) I wholeheartedly agree, and I'm glad someone else is jumping on this bandwagon (I'be been trumpetting this ideal for some time, though I don't think I'm the only one who has trumpetted this). Frank (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
|
(...) in (...) and (...) the (...) a (...) Yes. It was only a matter of time before you came around to my way of thinking :-) Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 x Armada Flagship = Armada Warship
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Frank Filz writes: <snip> Remember, trim geek unless you were commenting on signature doohickies! ++Lar (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
