| |
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Lee Meyer wrote:
> I let this roll around in my head for a day before posting a reply to this.
> There are a few things I have to post about this and I hope to get them out.
>
> 1. I have to say this is the first time in my life I have heard anyone try and
> tie sexual preference/orientation into Lego, and I am in my mid-thirites now.
> Why on earth is it necessary to do so? Lego is about Lego - building things
> with Lego, comparing designs, discussing colors, finding the pieces you need.
>
> 2. Why does everything now need to be sexualized? Why must everything have to
> have off-topic or nothing-to-do-with subtopic areas? Why do we have to
> balkanize ourselves into groups and cliques ("Didn't you know, Fred is that
> "gay" space designer"../.."oh yes, NOW I see it in his designs, the purple, it's
> gotta be the purple"...)
I snipped the rest of your stuff, but I just want to chime in with my agreement
to your point of view.
-Tim
(whose opinion shouldn't imply anyone else's opinion by his affiliations)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
207 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
