|
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 08:12:56PM +0000, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> Failing that, a way to go in and change the default FUT (that is, what
> the FUT is set to in the post itself, which posters still can change)
> on posts already made would be almost good enough. It wouldn't move
> posts but it would at least catch followup posts and direct them to
> the right place, unless the poster deliberately changed it (most
> misdirection is a result of just hitting post on a post that's already
> been flagged as being in the wrong place)
That might be the best solution - though it'll probably only work for
people who post via the web interface. News/Mail users will fail to get
the updates (I believe).
But it is the best idea solution I've heard. If you actually move the
post, do you send out emails to all the people that are subscribed to
the new newsgroup, but not the old? The NNTP subscribers will see the
whole thread appear, as if all at once - not sure if newsreaders are
supposed to realize that these messages were already viewed by the user
in the other newsgroup. I suspect the newsreaders will do the right
thing.
Just some things to consider :)
--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Move function
|
| Based on some recent activity and some not so recent, this suggestion is just a note that a thread move function would be useful. (it's believed to be terrifically hard to implement moving posts on the current LUGNET infrastructure) The posted (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|