 | | Re: Rebirth of Cool LEGO Site of the Week —Jeremy Scott
|
| | | (...) <snipped> (...) But if you are still a participating member of the community, without paid membership, why are you not a Lugnet member? I, and many along with me, have the free, watered down lugnet. Does this fact make me not a part of this (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jul-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Rebirth of Cool LEGO Site of the Week — Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | | (...) FYI: Todd is out of town until at least Monday. -Suz (22 years ago, 6-Jul-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Rebirth of Cool LEGO Site of the Week —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) It should be whatever we make it. If that involves voting restrictions for non-members, so be it. (...) I disagree. I'm not a bionicle fan, but have seen some bionicle related sites that I would *definitely* nominate (and vote) for such an (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jul-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Rebirth of Cool LEGO Site of the Week — Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Well, in fact, yes, I would. I think that's the best way, for technical reasons (essentially eliminates vote-stuffing), and it was always the idea to do it this way, and in fact voting was one of the many reasons that memberships were (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jul-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Rebirth of Cool LEGO Site of the Week —Jeremy Scott
|
| | | | Thank you Todd. I will now rest my case. Jeremy Scott (22 years ago, 8-Jul-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | |
