 | | Re: List of suggestions —Samarth Moray
| | | | (...) I agree. But I think that admins should be obligated to explain a rejection, but at their own discretion. I think preference should be given to explaining a descision rather than not, but of course, that isn't always possible. Legoswami (PS (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: List of suggestions —Leonard Hoffman
| | | | | (...) -snip- (...) "At their own discretion" ... wouldn't that also mean that Admins shouldn't be obligated? I'm a bit confused. Perhaps a good compromise would be, Admins are obligated to give a reason, but that reason need not be detailed. A (...) (20 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: List of suggestions —Samarth Moray
| | | | | (...) What I meant was that Admins should give preference to explaining something rather than 'keeping it a secret' if you will, but whether or not they actually should tell something should be left up to them, especially if it involves a sensitive (...) (20 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: List of suggestions —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) That's got plenty of wiggle... (...) I'm not sure I agree though, what's the value in posting a "we rejected this for technical reasons" with no more detail at all post at the tail end of the string if it shows rejected on the list, and if the (...) (20 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| | | | | | |
