 | | Re: List of suggestions —Duane Hess
|
| | | (...) Thanks, Lar. This is a great moral boost. Will there be any explanations when an item is rejected? -Duane (20 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: List of suggestions —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) Ooo. Excellent suggestion. Steve (20 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: List of suggestions —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) np... I've been complaining about not having one of these for a while, someone told me to put up or shut up! (...) Can't speak to that, or my morals... It's a great morale boost though, for me, anyway, though, see above. (...) That depends. I (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: List of suggestions —Orion Pobursky
|
| | | | (...) Why? If a reasonable explanation can be given, a explanation should be given. This is not the military (I get enough of that at work) and user donations drive this site. Therefore I think that if a user request is rejected, a reason for the (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: List of suggestions —Samarth Moray
|
| | | | (...) I agree. But I think that admins should be obligated to explain a rejection, but at their own discretion. I think preference should be given to explaining a descision rather than not, but of course, that isn't always possible. Legoswami (PS (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: List of suggestions —Leonard Hoffman
|
| | | | (...) -snip- (...) "At their own discretion" ... wouldn't that also mean that Admins shouldn't be obligated? I'm a bit confused. Perhaps a good compromise would be, Admins are obligated to give a reason, but that reason need not be detailed. A (...) (20 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: List of suggestions —Samarth Moray
|
| | | | (...) What I meant was that Admins should give preference to explaining something rather than 'keeping it a secret' if you will, but whether or not they actually should tell something should be left up to them, especially if it involves a sensitive (...) (20 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: List of suggestions —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) That's got plenty of wiggle... (...) I'm not sure I agree though, what's the value in posting a "we rejected this for technical reasons" with no more detail at all post at the tail end of the string if it shows rejected on the list, and if the (...) (20 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| | | | |
