|
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 10:14:26PM +0000, Kelly McKiernan wrote:
> - Consensus that this is what needs to happen
> - Development environment (which is getting closer)
> - Development time / resources
>
> I'd like to see if we can get a list of requested code changes /
> enhancements posted sometime, and see where this would fall in
> importance and ease of implementation. And if it even would make sense
> to implement, as that's still far from decided.
I can only speak to the ease of implementation, but I believe it should
be pretty simple. Maybe 3-4 files that will need to be edited, assuming
we don't get fancy and allow custom filter-word-lists.
--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
3 Messages in This Thread: ![Censorship (was Re: Bye, bye LUGNET) -Kelly McKiernan (1-Mar-05 to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Censorship (was Re: Bye, bye LUGNET) -Orion Pobursky (1-Mar-05 to lugnet.admin.suggestions)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|