 | | suggest a "Factory" group
|
|
There's already a lot of talk about LEGO Factory, scattered throughout the LUGNET hierarchy. I suggest a new group, probably at the root level (i.e. lugnet.factory). Best, Joe (21 years ago, 17-Aug-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Group needed for BrickWiki?
|
|
(...) I'm interested in how the Wiki and LUGNET can work together. more later. -Suz (21 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Group needed for BrickWiki?
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Ross Crawford wrote: A wiki logically does not need a group for discussion as a wiki can handle it itself...but yes a lugnet group for BrickWiki may be useful (who say I'm logical ?). (...) good Didier (21 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Group needed for BrickWiki?
|
|
Maybe under lugnet.publish? ROSCO (21 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-numbered sets in the database (Re: Book Reviews, feedback)
|
|
(...) Yes Dave is right. Dave and Eric Strand have been digging up lots of obscure Samsonite sets that were sold by department stores. As an example a 1969 Sears catalog shows set #49-C-4418, which is a 335 piece basic set. Not exactly a user (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
