To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.nntpOpen lugnet.admin.nntp in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / NNTP / 361
360  |  362
Subject: 
Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.nntp
Date: 
Sat, 10 Mar 2001 01:59:12 GMT
Viewed: 
3537 times
  
"Gino A. Melone" <gmelone@futurenext.com> writes:
> In lugnet.admin.nntp, Todd Lehman writes:
> > * Add new group lugnet.rave or lugnet.lego.rave?  Why or why not?
>   Ditto my comments about .rant.  Plus, I'd recomend a name change.  The term
> rave has certain connotations these days.  Connotations which I'm pretty sure
> most LUGNETers aren't interested in associating with LUGNET.  I suggest
> .praise.

I agree.  But "rant" doesn't really go with "praise" - how about
"whine" instead?  That might also keep people from taking themselves
too seriously when posting there, if they're "whining" instead of
"ranting".

> > * Delete lugnet.market.auction and lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade and replace
> >  these with lugnet.market.forsale, lugnet.market.wanted, and lugnet.market
> >  .swap?  Why or why not?
>   This sounds a lot less confusing.  Someone suggested combining swap/forsale.
> I'd disagree.  First, the same logic can be used for combining swap/wanted.
> That leads to a single .market group.  If someone wants to sell or swap, let
> them cross-post.

In another thread, the term "barter" was proposed for this; I like
that better than "swap".

> > * Move lugnet.trains.org to lugnet.org.train/ltc/etc., and move
> >  lugnet.castle.org to lugnet.org.castle, and move lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
> >  to lugnet.org.cad.ldraw (or something)?  Why or why not?
>   I think a cleaner path to organizations is a good idea.  Although, I'd
> recomend against creating generic headers like lugnet.org.train.  I'd go for
> lugnet.org.ltc, lugnet.org.cw/castleworld.  The terms castle and train (and
> such) are too generic in the LEGO community to be aquired by a single group.
> Other castle, train, etc groups with a different focus may develop and
> shouldn't be out-in-the-cold as it were.

I'm concerned about using "ltc" because someone who is new to Lugnet
might not recognize the acronym.  How about "train-club"?

--Bill.

--
William R Ward        hermit@bayview.com      http://www.bayview.com/~hermit/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others."-Groucho Marx



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
 
(...) I agree with the comment that it shouldn't be under .lego. Otherwise, this sounds like a good way to deal with the type of comments you describe. (...) Ditto my comments about .rant. Plus, I'd recomend a name change. The term rave has certain (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR