 | | Re: Request for groups: movies/LEGO Studio
|
|
(...) LOL! OOops, too much coffee this morning. It's not my fault. I just woke up. :-) I meant lugnet.x & lugnet.x.y vs. lugnet.x & lugnet.y, naturally. :-) (...) That's what I'm afraid of. There's so much overlap, but each one gets into specific (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for groups: movies/LEGO Studio
|
|
(...) I gotta remember that one!! (...) Not really. Tell me the difference between lugnet.x and lugnet.x.y (the first one) and lugnet.x and lugnet.x.y (the second one) if you would... But I agree with your thesis, I think. Specific usually ought to (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for groups: movies/LEGO Studio
|
|
(...) I think those names sound like a good start, but if one is a subset of the other (that is, both are for movies but one is more general than the other), then they ought to be named lugnet.x and lugnet.x.y rather than lugnet.x and lugnet.x.y -- (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for groups: movies/LEGO Studio
|
|
(...) How about either lugnet.build.movies or lugnet.publish.movies? I'd lean toward lugnet.build.movies. Steve (24 years ago, 15-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Request for groups: movies/LEGO Studio
|
|
I think that as more people buy and begin using LEGO Studio, there are going to be more films posted and talked about on LUGNET. I'd like to propose the following new groups: lugnet.studios - the 'theme group', for discussion of the sets themselves. (...) (24 years ago, 15-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
