Subject:
|
Re: New newsgroups for product line years
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 17:37:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1853 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 04:34:14PM +0000, Steve Bliss wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.nntp, Todd Lehman wrote:
>
> > As information about the upcoming 2001 product line becomes available, please
> > feel free to crosspost between lugnet.year.2001 and other relevant areas, for
> > example lugnet.starwars and lugnet.year.2001 if the discussions are relevant
> > to both Star Wars and to the year-2001 product line.
>
> When cross-posting, is there any preference on whether to direct
> followup-to into or out-of the .year hierarchy?
>
> I'd say if a message should be cross-posted with .year.* and .elsewhere,
> the followup-to should go into .year.*. Generally speaking, of course.
> There are always exceptions.
hmmm.... I wonder if we could set up the year* groups to automagically take
any post about sets of those years.... so any post about 8880 would be copied
to year.1994... that way, the year.* would have more than just new sets talk...
:)
--
Dan Boger / dan@peeron.com / www.peeron.com / ICQ: 1130750
<set:5854_1>: Pony Trekking (LEGO/Belville/Equestrian), '97, 2 figs
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New newsgroups for product line years
|
| (...) When cross-posting, is there any preference on whether to direct followup-to into or out-of the .year hierarchy? I'd say if a message should be cross-posted with .year.* and .elsewhere, the followup-to should go into .year.*. Generally (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
