|
|
 | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) Oops, my mistake. Since I know I posted more than 1 message in 2001 I didn't twig that the first numerical column wasn't the difference!. (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) Yes, it has been pointed out to me Dan posted two versions of the 2001 list and I used the incorrect one. I'll see if I can rework the whole thing later today or in the weekend. Best, /Tobbe (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) I think you may have a problem with your information for 2001. I posted more than 19 times and I am pretty sure Larry posted more than the 225 times you reported for him. Jude (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) ... (...) ... (...) ... Tobbe, I'm not as big a rocket as you might suggest. I think that you may have used the wrong list from 2001. As I recall, Dan Boger posted two lists; the first one was incorrect. correct 2001 list (URL) Clark 193 (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) I'm not quite sure I follow you, but as I did the list I found _a_lot_ of people that either did not post at all or only a few posts in 2001 that had a fair amount of posts in 2002. Of course I took away everyone who posted less then 50 times (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
