General Discussions about LUGNET : Search Results: password

Administrative / General / Search Results: password

Results 381 – 400 of 524.

Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
(...) it got a "adequate". Sorry, I can't tell you what it is right now, though. Handy tool. Appreciate your making it available. ++Lar (27 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.157)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
(...) Bummer -- that makes me suspect that it really truly is a horrible password then (as you surmised, and pointed out to your coworker). Yet it passed, which makes me nervous. Welp, if you someday are able to convince your coworker that this (...) (27 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.157)

		Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
(...) OK, I've done more research into human factors of passwords and have crufted together[1] what I hope is a rather froody password checker. First, it's got a _moby_ database of more than 2.7 million words, names, phrases, numbers, and other (...) (27 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general) !

password
(score: 0.157)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
(...) the ~ key (without pressing Shift) Here are the keyboard rows: 0 1 å/-À¶ØÖ¤µ¨¢ª 0 1 +ñòóôÙßõö÷øù 1 1 æäÓ¾ÐÑÕÃ¹ÂºÅ£ 1 1 ð"®±¸íê³Ï°,¥ 2 1 ¿Ë¡´àéèÒÊÇ§ 2 1 Ä¦¯â¬çëÉÈ«. 3 1 ¼»áÍÔ×·Áã½ 3 1 ()©ÎÚì?²ÌÆ Might want to take that into consideration... (...) (27 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.157)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
(...) It's my box, and it's going to a show, I was there when the password was set and I know it's not a very good one. But despite being the PM of the project I don't just want to stamp my foot and make them change the password, I'd rather provide (...) (27 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.156)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
(...) The checker should equate the following IMHO: \|_ L + t < k ~ n \/ V () O or 0 "\/()+eF0rMe" (Vote for Me) for example gives a 788% success rate. "\|_uGn3+" which is a complicated way to write "Lugnet" passes with 481% "\|_eGoBr\|<K5" (LegoBricks) (...) (27 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.156)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
Larry Pieniazek wrote: <snip> (...) I'm not a guru on the subject by any means, but while an attacker using wordlists and trying to crack a password with bruteforce or something like, I mean, by trial and error, I think any combination of dates are (...) (27 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.156)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
Frank Filz wrote in message ... (...) appropriate (...) Thought of another reason to allow parameters or options to the checker... Some systems have restrictions on length of password, some systems are not case sensitive, some systems may not allow (...) (27 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.156)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
(...) from (...) ALL (...) that (...) numbers (...) This was a hypothetical example. Dates are not actually good passwords, but they're easy to use to demonstrate differences in context. my birthday is a bad password for me (one of the first few (...) (27 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.156)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
(...) Yup -- those are the ones from Oxford! Great lists!!! --Todd (27 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.156)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
(...) Down the road prolly... Gotta get this cut over ASAP and get the pages stuff finished up... Did it give you enough flexibility that you could find something it liked that you could use? (That's it's only real purpose, even if it happens to be (...) (27 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.156)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
Neat Todd! (...) It thinks <({})> is fine 250% and doesn't detect it as a pallindrome even though it is from a human point of view. You might want to add something that recognizes stuff encapsulated within open and close of the same type of (...) (27 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.156)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes: <pw checker, play away... some design notes> Played with it some more and I am not sure I totally trust it. It thinks MT-5561 is a GREAT password and LEGOSystem4558 is a really bad one. I'm happy to (...) (27 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.156)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
(...) Right! do all the really obvious checks first (the ones that would say things like "you know, using your first name may not be a good choice for a password") to save cycles. Well, let's have at it, I have some pw's I'd like an opinion on, and (...) (27 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.156)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
(...) I can say this much. It's not your tests. It's the context. Just like your tests give (hypothetically speaking) Lugnet123 a so so score because Lugnet isn't a word, but we know that lugnet isn't a very good root for a password to lugnet (...) (27 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.156)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) [0-9]{4} . (...) to (...) longer (...) Waahh, now it hates one of my passwords... Hm, would you consider parametizing some of the things (or is the code something easily portable)? I'd like to check passwords (...) (27 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.156)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
(...) I haven't decoded the ASCII+127 yet on those...sorry. (...) I would love them, if you have any in their native ISO-8859-# encoding. --Todd (27 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.156)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
By the way, for the special characters, it knows what "selcuk" is but doesn't know the "selçuk", which is actually the correct form. Do you want any Turkish wordlists? Selçuk (...) (27 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.156)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
(...) Cool! And thanks for checking! --Todd (27 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.156)

		Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
Wow, your wordlists are just nice. They even knows me and my wife..:-) Selçuk (...) (27 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.156)

More: Next Page >>