To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / Search Results: password
 Results 101 – 120 of about 520.
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) ftp://sable.ox.ac.uk...wordlists/ :) Dan (24 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.837)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) The checker should equate the following IMHO: |_ L + t < k ~ n \/ V () O or 0 "\/()+eF0rMe" (Vote for Me) for example gives a 788% success rate. "|_uGn3+" which is a complicated way to write "Lugnet" passes with 481% "|_eGoBr|<K5" (LegoBricks) (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.837)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) What's involved in setting up an https server? I remember reading once upon a time (it must've been about 2 years ago) that it could be kind of a mess, and that connections often took 1 second to authenticate. That would be a problem for (...) (24 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.837)

  Re: New feature: Article rating
 
(...) Thick-skulled, maybe...dunno if I agree about boneheaded. :) I guess next time I'll hafta read your mind. I only had what you wrote to go on -- which seemed to be implying something false. I was only replying to point out that it -was- indeed (...) (24 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.837)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
Neat Todd! (...) It thinks <({})> is fine 250% and doesn't detect it as a pallindrome even though it is from a human point of view. You might want to add something that recognizes stuff encapsulated within open and close of the same type of (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.837)

  Re: New feature: Article rating
 
(...) Excellent point. Thanks. You've just demonstrated that a machine generated password does absolutely nothing to ensure (as in 100%) that a password is actually unique to a particular system. It makes it more probable, but doesn't (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

password
(score: 0.836)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) ...Hmmm. I dug up old passwords from long dead servers (don't u hate it when u remember passwords, but not the login id? :-) ...But anyway, I tried '4Gxc5t'... it came back failed but its reasoning was strange... (try it urself :-) the 'slight (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

password
(score: 0.836)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) stunning, but (...) Indeed. I got an excellent. : ) At least I got some decent passwords, if nothing else! Scott S. (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.836)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) Inconsistent results. It quite happily failed obvious stuff like "James1" or "Galliard" or "June15", but also missed some glaring ones. For example, it failed my Social Insurance number, but only because it was all from 1 keyboard row. It (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

password
(score: 0.836)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) I got a 421%, and then a -125%. Very interesting, i might have to switch some of my passwords here now! :) Scott S. (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.836)

  Re: New feature: Article rating
 
(...) A password system that, I remind you, controls your access to *two* things- neither one of which even approaches being essential to normal use. (...) I think that Todd's reasoning, posted elsewhere in this thread, is well-thought-out. Trying (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

password
(score: 0.836)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) the wrong way. "Toy" as in "geek thing to play with" rather than as in "insignificant".) (...) Yes! Several passwords of the form "[l3G0]" (with brackets but without the quotation marks) get an adequate passing grade of ~149%. Try things like (...) (24 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.836)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) Ugh. "[l3G()]" gets a 506% passing grade. (24 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.836)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) 1. Can you use https for this? 2. How about a 'passwords submitted aren't logged' privacy statement? Why? 'Cause it's so cool I was instantly tempted into typing in old passwords that I no longer use, and was almost tempted into typing in (...) (24 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

password
(score: 0.836)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) It's not too hard. But I forgot; you're using a web hosting place. (Pair?) Depending on what level of service you're paying for, you may already have ssl support. (Or conversely, it may not be an option.) (...) I've not noticed that bad of a (...) (24 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.836)

  Re: New feature: Article rating
 
(...) Yeah, I don't think I've ever "signed in" simply because I can't bother to keep up with another password I didn't pick. Once I hear I can login ONCE with this password I refuse to put any effort into holding onto or remembering and change it (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

password
(score: 0.836)

  Re: New feature: Article rating
 
(...) That'll require my password...I hope this doesn't sound pushy, but when are the 260's packets going out? --Bram (24 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.836)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) dang... I'm terrible... though, i did find one that got a %507... :) thanks todd, i love this :) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.836)

  Re: New feature: Article rating
 
(...) Then implement a username/password system that doesn't require a membership but can accomodate one. Pretty simple, just have a membership field in the record. People who are just trying it out can read and post, but not access member-only (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general) ! 
 

password
(score: 0.836)

  Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) I got p@$$\/\/0?oI through it as a 169. Mwhahahahahahaha! Alan (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

password
(score: 0.836)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR