To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 9240 (-10)
  Re: Invoice for Brickbay Order #16688
 
i was wondering why you posted personal info on other guy in here. hope other guy isnt too upset. -- And they said 'Computers will never be in general use' "Michael Edwards" <medwards@ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message news:GEIqyI.5qH@lugnet.com... (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  (canceled)
 
 
  (canceled)
 
 
  Supporting RFC1738 URLs
 
Hi, I noticed that the URL in the article below (URL) not get recognized as a an URL, even though it follows the standard set in RFC1738. Well, only the first part of the URL gets recognized. See the section "APPENDIX: Recommendations for URLs in (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Membership
 
(...) You are correct. ;] It's pretty nifty. KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203, Windsor, Ontario, Canada (23 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Membership
 
(...) You are correct. I joined about 2 months ago (member #1000) and received my password by email one day after Todd received my payment via Paypal (I don't know if he is always so quick though). Ken (23 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Membership
 
(...) Ditto. I'm not stressing over it since it seems to make little difference to anything. As Larry P says, the sign-in password is the main thing. Kerry (23 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: I'm back...
 
(...) good point - guess web posting is easy to put a password on... nntp should be doable, though I've never played with it... as for email, guess the authorization email back to the sender method would work... Dan (23 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: I'm back...
 
(...) One problem with any kind of opt-in security or member-only security, is that it does not protect the *community*. While spoofing someone's id does damage to that one person, it also damages the entire community. And if anyone can be spoofed, (...) (23 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: I'm back...
 
(...) Of course, once authenticated as anybody, you can post as anyone else with ease, neh? (23 years ago, 29-May-01, to lugnet.admin.general)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR