| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Dave Low writes:
> I disagree with the "demi-god" comment, and I think the "deal with it NOW"
> banner is in atrocious taste. I'm not part of the ldraw community, and I
> suppose how they remember James is their choice. However [very deep breath],
> I think Matthew has a reasonable point.
>
> Some of the memorial images are respectfully sombre, some less so. I'm not
> convinced that the memorial page needs a dozen alternative image links. And
> I think some effort should be made to get his year of birth correct on all
> of them.
I agree there's a point there, but there are also more polite and
appropriate ways of going about making that point.
Anyways, I cleaned it up a bit. Didn't fix the dates (yet) because that'll
take a little bit more time. If anyone wants to do that, feel free.
Honoring and remembering someone in the community who has made a great
contribution, and balancing that with moving forward, is a difficult and
sensitive thing to do. Different people hold different feelings towards
someone like James and his memory, effort needs to be made to be sensitive
to all.
-Tim
LDraw.org
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: I'm back...
|
| (...) Hence the futility of banning/repeat-cancelling Mr Moulton. I would never defend his past actions, but I see no point in continually bringing them up. Especially when he actually has some good stuff to show off, despite the rat-baggage. Who (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
