|
|
 | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) Which is a succinct way of saying that he was basically a jerk. :) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) I think you may have misunderstood why I mentioned your member number (note I didn't mention mine). I also don't think your number should necessarily indicate you have some sort of status or "power" here. I referenced it simply because I (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) Gee, Lar--why do I have the feeling that this isn't an entirely hypothetical example? 8^) Dave! (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) So would I. Of course, discussing it would imply the person with the negative opinion was around to discuss it. :D I'm really not saying that you should be forced to agree in any way with anything anyone says, or that you should not have the (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Mike Stanley writes: <snip> (...) That statement I would not take as being a threat but like I said I don't know what people said to Todd privately and I assume there were many people writing Todd privately about the topic (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
