|
|
 | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) Why should he not express how he feels? If he leaves it there, and you don't like it, no one is forcing you to go to his site and look at it, or to say that it's right. Why should taking that off his site be a contingency of his being accepted (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Todd, This MUST end now...
|
| Todd, it's time to end this once and for all... ou know how I stand. You see how others have reacted. The time for discussion is over. A decision shoud be made. Doesn't anyone see what is so abundantly clear? Matt's intent was to disrupt this (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| "Mike Stanley" <cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com> wrote in message news:G2qJ13.95M@lugnet.com... (...) a (...) sap who (...) overly-nice (...) person (...) many (...) he (...) can (...) that he (...) "apology" - (...) therefore (...) I'm a bit unsure on the (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) And now he might be let back in. So my question stands. (...) How can you be so sure that he's being dishonest? What do you stand to lose if he's given a chance to really show what he wants to do on Lugnet? (...) Where? (...) How can you be (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
