Subject:
|
Re: In conclusion... (my stance hasn't changed)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 15:54:01 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
moulton@hscisNOSPAM.net
|
Viewed:
|
2587 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:42:18 GMT, "John Robert-Blaze Kanehl"
<johnNYblaze44@webtv.net> wrote:
> The problem is these words of apology are hollow and devoid of meaning.
If I didn't mean what I said I wouldn't even BE here. I know I
screwed up, even more so than you can realize. If my apology wasn't
heart felt then why am I here? You seem to think I'm some sort of
evil person, that I have some alterior motive in store. If that were
the case I gaurentee the current situation would be WAY different from
what it is now. I'm not the kind of person who just hands out
apologies left and right. Only when I think someone REALLY deserves
one.
> The above comment on experiments is expounded upon, revelled in, and worn as
> a badge of honor in later thread posts. When Matt decides to "experiment"
> in Lugnet...will it be for "righteous" and "altruistic reasons? (AND I MEAN
> WHEN)
I already said that I wasn't, not here, not ever.
> These are the FACTS, as I see them. I may be mistaken. This is Todd's
> call, I realize that completely. I think that all of thepreceding posts,
> and particularly Matt's own words should be read carefully. I stand by my
> earlier assessment after hearing ABSOLUTLEY no compelling argument from any
> other member and especially from Matt:
I didn't see any facts in your arguments, all I saw was you looking
for every little snippit that you could use to try and get me banned
because you hate me. Not because of what you think I am, you hate me
because of my beliefs. Yes, I was wrong to share my beliefs here, and
I won't do it again, ever. Does that mean I'm going to change my
beliefs? No. Does that mean I'm not sorry for trying to deliberatly
hurt someone in order to get a point across. No. I set out to cause
dammage, but I didn't think it was real. I thought that the minute 2
or 3 people would start backing up Jude that my "attack" would be
taken with a grain of salt. I didn't think that there would be hurt
feelings, mine if any, but no one elses. If that had been the case, I
probably wouldn't be here right now. But you see I do care, and I
don't like to see other people get hurt, that was not my intent. And
I am truly sorry, and as I said before I know that that is not enough,
but it's a start. I'm doing something else here too that will help
relieve some peoples hurt feelings. By acting as a virtual punching
bag I can let help some people feel better.
-Matthew
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: In conclusion... (my stance hasn't changed)
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Moulton writes: By acting as a virtual punching (...) Matthew: Please give up the martyr routine. We are here because you have said some nasty things and violated the TOS. I feel just fine about myself today, thanks. (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | In conclusion... (my stance hasn't changed)
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, John Robert-Blaze Kanehl writes: Todd, I respect that you have the final "judgement" in this case. I have accepted that from day one here on Lugnet, so be it. Discussion has gone on long enough, almost as long or longer than (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
122 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
