|
|
 | | Re: Let’s be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.)
|
| Scott A wrote: <snip> (...) Scott, actually I like some grinding gears just inside some other regular ones, so I like reading your posts, but MM is completely out of any comparison I think (actually I'm sure). It's not the just this or that post (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | In conclusion... (my stance hasn't changed)
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, John Robert-Blaze Kanehl writes: Todd, I respect that you have the final "judgement" in this case. I have accepted that from day one here on Lugnet, so be it. Discussion has gone on long enough, almost as long or longer than (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) I empathize with you completely. When I came to LUGNET in March I also had a lot of ideas that I was all excited about, and most of the time I was told that something was already in the works, there wasn't any interest, or whatever. I do think (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Thanks...
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G2prp1.719@lugnet.com... (...) from (...) post (...) 6:30 (...) I thougt it had to do with old crappy MS-mail protocol together with an SMTP-gate at the mailserver? Or maybe not. (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: My Stance
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G2ps0v.7xy@lugnet.com... (...) Todd is (...) month/week? (...) ALL (...) nice (...) this (...) devil's (...) to (...) is (...) glossed (...) was (...) about (...) them by (...) Well (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
