Subject:
|
Re: So where is Brad's answer to the 2001 info?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 20 Aug 2000 22:49:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
254 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Miller writes:
> Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote:
> > - What is a "reasonable" amount of time? I would argue that for many things, a
> > "reasonable" amount of time does not allow the above sequence to be followed
> > given the speed at which information can propagate electronically.
>
> However, it has an effect which the more draconian-seeming approach of going
> over the head of the original poster doesn't -- it makes other people more
> likely to voluntarily stop spreading the information.
>
> If the original poster would have posted a message saying
>
> "Oops; Lego tells me that the information I posted was supposed to be
> confidential. I guess Target screwed up. I've deleted my message
> containging the information. Please don't spread it anymore. Thanks."
>
> then I would have been more instintively inclined to feel sympathetic. When
> the posts are removed in a way that feels like censorship (whether it really
> is or not), it makes people get a little thrill out of passing the info
> around despite the edict: makes us feel like we're the Underground
> Resistance stickin' it to the Man.
>
> Interacting with people personally and respectfully goes a long way towards
> countering this. Acting in a heavy-handed manner to crush the information
> may actually make it spread faster.
Absolutely -- I agree! -- and when I said before that I preferred clear legal
requests to non-legal requests, I don't mean I prefer to heard heavy-handed
manners :) but just to know that it's a legal request for removal. It can be
perfectly polite (as LEGO always is, in my experience), but it's gotta clearly
be a legal request and not an appeal to sensibilities or anything fuzzy like
that.
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: So where is Brad's answer to the 2001 info?
|
| (...) However, it has an effect which the more draconian-seeming approach of going over the head of the original poster doesn't -- it makes other people more likely to voluntarily stop spreading the information. If the original poster would have (...) (24 years ago, 20-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
