| |
Larry Pieniazek <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote:
> So you're agreeing, then? Nothing here was censored, which is confirmed by
> the very definitions you quote.
I think Scott is right on this one. While censorship usually has the
implication of morality-judgements, it's also used in the sense of keeping
things secret. Think of a military censor, watching the media to keep out
any information that might give away important tactical information (or sway
public opinion). Same sorta thing.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) I have always believed that censorship was something which happened (or did not happen) before something is published (or not published). Although retroactive censorship by a third party (if that is what you consider has occurred here) may (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
176 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
