| | Geek Code? Jeremy Rear
|
| | Hey everyone- Do we use the old RTL LEGO® geek code here, or will those who do get pelted with rotten tomatoes? :-) (BTW - I don't think I have ever used it before! :-) jeremy (26 years ago, 30-Sep-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: Geek Code? Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | | Jeremy Rear (j.rear@worldnet.att.net) asked: | Do we use the old RTL LEGO® geek code here, or will those who do get | pelted with rotten tomatoes? :-) I'll try and see what happens. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: (...) (26 years ago, 30-Sep-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: Geek Code? Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) The standard Meta Geek Code works well for Lego too: gc I have a Geek Code !gc I don't have a Geek Code. Provides all the information you _really_ need to know. (26 years ago, 30-Sep-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: Geek Code? Thomas Main
|
| | | | (...) I have never used the Geek code. Here is one I worked up a while back, though. Is this in the right format? LEGO: TO+++(6399) TR+++(7740) TC++(8480) MOC++ CA+(375) #++ S- LS+ Hmu M+ A++++ LM- YB69m (26 years ago, 30-Sep-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Geek Code? Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | (...) So.. what the _hell_ does this mean? (Sorry, not RTL regular :) ) Jasper (26 years ago, 3-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Geek Code? Michael Huffman
|
| | | | (...) Check out: (2 URLs) decipher it. --Mike. (26 years ago, 7-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |