To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 6469
6468  |  6470
Subject: 
Re: PW validation (was: Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Wed, 26 Apr 2000 02:37:29 GMT
Viewed: 
2655 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Mike Stanley writes:
[...]
I've fed it almost every password I've ever used, some of which took more
than a day on a P2 for l0phtcrack to brute-force, and it failed them all.
[...]
I've got a password or three now that it passes, taking a tip from your
"first letter of each word of a sentence" comment.  But I don't see them
as any better than the multitude it failed.
[...]

Thanks for the above data points.  How badly did it fail them by?

Did you catch this post from Monday?--

   http://www.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=6459

What threshold number was below the all the number returned for the ones you
tried that it failed?  Would a threshold of, say, 50 (instead of the current
100) pass all of the ones that it's currently failing?  Would a threshold of
-100?

(The threshold is just a number on a scale -- that scale can be adjusted.)

--Todd



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: PW validation (was: Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful?)
 
(...) Pretty badly - I know they were all worthless. I didn't really pay attention to the numbers. I think they were as low negatively, though, as the "first leter from each word in a sentence" was positively, though. (...) I think they were all < (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: PW validation (was: Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful?)
 
(...) I haven't posted with respect to this in a while, but I would like to say that if you use this current validator to validate what people can choose for passwords you might as well just not use it and keep sticking people with the ones you are (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  

309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR