Subject:
|
Re: PW validation (was: Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 Apr 2000 02:37:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2655 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Mike Stanley writes:
> [...]
> I've fed it almost every password I've ever used, some of which took more
> than a day on a P2 for l0phtcrack to brute-force, and it failed them all.
> [...]
> I've got a password or three now that it passes, taking a tip from your
> "first letter of each word of a sentence" comment. But I don't see them
> as any better than the multitude it failed.
> [...]
Thanks for the above data points. How badly did it fail them by?
Did you catch this post from Monday?--
http://www.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=6459
What threshold number was below the all the number returned for the ones you
tried that it failed? Would a threshold of, say, 50 (instead of the current
100) pass all of the ones that it's currently failing? Would a threshold of
-100?
(The threshold is just a number on a scale -- that scale can be adjusted.)
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
309 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|