Subject:
|
Re: PW validation (was: Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 23 Apr 2000 13:18:20 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
3164 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > So are you going to enforce that people HAVE to set their passwords to
> > things that the validator feels don't suck,
>
> That is its purpose.
Draconian and rather big-parentish. Why can't I take the risk of a sucky
password if I so choose? Not that I personally would, mind you.
Now, unlike government jackbootedness, we do as consumers have a choice not to
use Lugnet... but what exactly is the harm of allowing sucky passwords? It
falls entirely or for the most part on the person who made the poor choice. Why
be their daddy?
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
