Subject:
|
Re: PW validation (was: Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 22 Apr 2000 04:10:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2750 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> having a password validator that doesn't suck is IMHO a fundamental
> prerequisite to allowing passwords to be changed. Anything less is
> irresponsible.
Even if you have great passwords - can't just anyone in the intervening
networks between the user and LUGNET just snoop in and copy down the
unencrypted password?
Richard
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
309 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|