Subject:
|
Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Apr 2000 18:31:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2771 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Miller writes:
> Yeah, I agree that "+" has connotations of "better". But I think the "!"
> seems to have a "Warning" feeling to it, especially in red. (It's a typical
> icon in warning error message dialog boxes, for example.) That doesn't mean
> it's necessarily a bad choice -- maybe it's just me. If it weren't for the
> space issue, I'd pick "*".
Welp, space isn't really _that_ much of an issue compared to the symbol itself.
All things being equal, a thinner character is better than a big fat character
like "+". Let's see what people think about "!" after seeing it for a little
while...I seem to remember visiting a discussion group site once which used a
small orange "!" image to mark something that was important -- it didn't seem
to me like a "don't read this!" but obviously a "read this!".
(Anyone else reading this -- if you think "!" is a terrible choice or have
another suggestion, please let us know! We can certainly try out "*" if "!"
sends the wrong impression.)
--Todd
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
309 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|