To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 6329
6328  |  6330
Subject: 
Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Fri, 21 Apr 2000 18:31:28 GMT
Viewed: 
2771 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Miller writes:
Yeah, I agree that "+" has connotations of "better". But I think the "!"
seems to have a "Warning" feeling to it, especially in red. (It's a typical
icon in warning error message dialog boxes, for example.) That doesn't mean
it's necessarily a bad choice -- maybe it's just me. If it weren't for the
space issue, I'd pick "*".

Welp, space isn't really _that_ much of an issue compared to the symbol itself.
All things being equal, a thinner character is better than a big fat character
like "+".  Let's see what people think about "!" after seeing it for a little
while...I seem to remember visiting a discussion group site once which used a
small orange "!" image to mark something that was important -- it didn't seem
to me like a "don't read this!" but obviously a "read this!".

(Anyone else reading this -- if you think "!" is a terrible choice or have
another suggestion, please let us know!  We can certainly try out "*" if "!"
sends the wrong impression.)

--Todd



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) For what it's worth, slrn uses ! to mark highly-scored (via my own score file) articles. So I'm certainly used to it. (I thought it kind of odd of slrn too, but no one asked me for feedback there....) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
  Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) I like + over *, but unless the !'s font is darker, it's worthless to me. I have fairly good eyes, but I can barely even see that the article is rated. Again, I introduce you to Mr. Dead Horse...Why not use 1-5 instead of !-!!!!!, *-*****, (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
 
(...) Yeah, I agree that "+" has connotations of "better". But I think the "!" seems to have a "Warning" feeling to it, especially in red. (It's a typical icon in warning error message dialog boxes, for example.) That doesn't mean it's necessarily a (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR