To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 6264
6263  |  6265
Subject: 
Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Fri, 21 Apr 2000 01:52:27 GMT
Viewed: 
2113 times
  
Todd L wrote:

1.  How would you feel (better or worse) if the numeric values of the ratings
were not displayed to you unless you specifically requested (via some simple
setting) that they be displayed to you?

Better

2.  How would you feel (better or worse) if the numeric values of the ratings
were not displayed ever to anyone but collected and used by the server only
for internal calculations, hotlist generation, and personal recommendations
to you?

Better

3.  How would you feel (better or worse) if the ratings were not even
collected and collated in the first place?  (i.e. the destruction of the
feature altogether)

Better

4.  Have you ever felt victimized by the rating system?  Have you posted
something which has obtained a low rating and felt uncomfortable or unhappy
about yourself or about LUGNET because of the low rating?  How often?

Sort of: not "uncomfortable or unhappy about yourself or about LUGNET"
but annoyed and indignant. Only once, because I use a newsreader 99% of
the time and don't normally see the ratings.

5.  Have you ever felt victimized indirectly by seeing someone else's post
get a high rating?  How often?

No

6.  Do you feel that the article rating system makes it easier for you or
harder for you to share your ideas?  And does this bother you?

No effect (having looked at the ratings and decided I didn't like how
they worked or felt, I went back to my newsreader so I don't see em)

7.  How does your initial reaction to the announcement of the article rating
system compare to your current opinion of it?

Sounded like a good idea at the time: actual experience seems not useful
and actively repellent to some people.

8.  Do you feel that it is too early, too late, or the right time to address
these issues?

The righ t time.

9.  What other areas (besides news articles) can you imagine that a
collaborative ratings system would be most helpful to you?  LEGO sets?
Websites?  Individual web pages?  etc...

Lego sets. Impersonal things (ie not individuals messages or individuals
web sites).

Kevin

--
Personal Lego Web page:
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/kwilson_tccs/lego.html
eBay auctions:http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/kevinw1/
Subscribe to my Lego auction mailing list:
http://www.onelist.com/subscribe/Legopartsales?referer=1



Message is in Reply To:
  Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
 
All, It seems at this point that the article rating feature -- intended to help -- is actually causing more harm than good to the community. It's difficult to gauge how much harm is being done when opinions are so varied, but it's clear that (...) (25 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.announce) !! 

309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR