Subject:
|
Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Apr 2000 23:03:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6344 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Peter White writes:
> > > 3. How would you feel (better or worse) if the ratings were not even
> > > collected and collated in the first place? (i.e. the destruction of the
> > > feature altogether)
> >
> > No it should stay, as Lugnet traffic grows we will need some tool to pick
> > items of most interest for those of us with less time.
>
> Here BTW is a quick example of a "top N" list (N=40)...
>
> http://www.lugnet.com/top40.cgi
>
> It's just an experimental page, and it may go away without notice. I'll leave
> it up for at least a few days, though, for feedback. It's updated once hourly
> by a cron job. The ratings aren't shown in the listing itself, only in the
> body of the article snippet. Your personal news-filter settings from
I like the top 40, and hope it stays.
I was hopefully speaking for others with the 'less time' comment, I myself
use the web browser to look for interesting post titles or hop into ng's I
have an interest in, I admit to spending hours browsing on lugnet at a time.
-pete.w
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
