To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 6231
6230  |  6232
Subject: 
Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Thu, 20 Apr 2000 19:26:45 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
2215 times
  
Some miscellaneous unordered thoughts:

- I would be inclined to say that the rating system is definitely
harmfull. I have not seen anyone say "wow, this rating system just
helped me read through 2 weeks of posts and catch up on all the
important stuff", but we have seen several people express bitterness
about it.

- without a uniform way of applying ratings, I don't see how usefull it
will be. One example I came up with is suppose a bunch of people felt
that any post in lugnet.off-topic.humor should be rated 0-20 because
overall they are irrelevant, and they don't want them to show up in
general searches. On the other hand, another group of people rate
messages based heavily on the appropriateness of the message to the
group it's in (figuring that the search will let them adjust the weight
of all messages in a group), rate the funniest humor posts highly.

- I haven't paid too much attention to the ratings, but just looked over
the ratings of my posts. I didn't see any real problems.

- I tend to pay more attention to the response my messages gain. Of
course there is one area where this frustrates me. There has been
discussion going on about the T&C for a few months or so now. Several
times it has seemed that we were working towards some usefull goal, and
then all of a sudden a pall of silence drifts over the discussion. As a
result, it doesn't feel like anything has been accomplished. People are
still posting auctions in wrong places and people are still getting
blasted for posting a non-auction market post to a non-market group.

--
Frank Filz

-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com (business only please)
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
 
A couple more thoughts: - Anytime you have a way to compare reactions about things, there is opportunity for people to feel that their contribution wasn't valued. Note that we have someone currently bummed out that they got a lukewarm reaction to (...) (25 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  

Message is in Reply To:
  Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
 
All, It seems at this point that the article rating feature -- intended to help -- is actually causing more harm than good to the community. It's difficult to gauge how much harm is being done when opinions are so varied, but it's clear that (...) (25 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.announce) !! 

309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR