 | | Re: the latest news —Richard Franks
|
| | | (...) Unless you can name some names, and cite some examples then I don't think I can agree. Also, 'noise makers' is a bit of a troublesome term - eg. not many posts caused more noise than your request to change the T&C, and that didn't shape policy (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: the latest news —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | "Richard Franks" <spontificus@__nospa...yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Ft9Is6.JAC@lugnet.com... (...) to a (...) I (...) many (...) didn't (...) Sorry I wrote that with TM's "air of self-righteousness" comment in my head - absolutely no slur was (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: the latest news —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Exactly. Ultimately, the output of the ratings (the composite ratings for each article) are nothing more than a recommendation to read the article. Higher scores mean higher recommendations to read. (Lower scores might also mean that too, if (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
