 | | Re: bug in partsref? —Dan Boger
|
| | | On Wed, 5 Apr 2000 14:14:33 GMT "Jennifer L. Boger" <jennr@gwis2.circ.gwu.edu> wrote concerning 'Re: bug in partsref?': (...) ahhh.... the source says: Showing 1#150;1 of 1 match... tsk tsk Todd - it's not good practice to access chars directly - (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: bug in partsref? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Mozilla doesn't?! Wow, bad Mozilla. :-( I thought it knew how to handle all the Netscape proposed HTML entities. *Is* there an accepted entity name for the en-dash? (I'll go look it up later if nobody knows off-hand. Last time I looked (I (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: bug in partsref? —Dan Boger
|
| | | | (...) well, just checked it with NN6pr1 for linux as well, and got the same result... the &150; isn't showing... I did look a bit today, but couldn't find an endash entity... anyone happen to know if the &####; is an official part of html? I wonder (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
