Subject:
|
Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Mar 2000 18:08:57 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
3789 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Frank Filz writes:
> I have a suggestion, you may want to test substitute things like "!" as
> a substitute for "l" or "i".
You mean, change from checking !->i to checking both !->i and !->l ? (It
does currently check !->i -- did that not work for you in some instance?)
> Have you thought about vowels being dropped and K/c substitutions.
Good idea!
> I have a password which I would consider a worthless password the way you
> are scoring them which depends on these two transformations. I'll be
> happy to e-mail it to Todd directly if he wants to look at it and
> consider how to detect
Lemme see about the above suggestions and then you can try it again later
without having to email it...
> (of course that may start to become hard to ever
> find a password, for things like this, the weakness may depend on
> context [i.e. what is the account being used for, or what are the
> person's interests]).
Well, in the end, the checker is doing more of a "randomness evaluation"
than anything else. Memorability and practicality aside, the best passwords
are those which are close to being truly random and far away from being
generateable by looping or cracking algorithms. So the trick is to find
a password which is still memorable and typeable while being randomish
enough.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
