 | | Re: New feature: Article rating —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) (low) (...) ...just my opinion I think the score has little value without knowing how many people have read the post and have chosen not to vote - it could be argued (not by me) that these readers should register an automatic 50 score as they (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New feature: Article rating —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Interesting idea. If the server knew who saw what, perhaps! But we're not there yet I don't think, especially if we take news into account (and mail subscriptions... how is the server to know whether some one pored over it or deleted it (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New feature: Article rating —Sheree Rosenkrantz
|
| | | | Scott A <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> wrote in message news:Fs38I5.Dno@lugnet.com... (...) read (...) I do not rate posts now. I am a beginner. I read in odd pockets of time as much as I can across the board category wise on a daily basis. Much in some (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
