Subject:
|
Re: New feature: Article rating
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 26 Mar 2000 03:47:15 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
1651 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Richard Franks writes:
> I think questions should be voted - especially if the answer is wanted by a
> lot of people, but does that mean that the question post should be voted
> lower once it has been answered? From a "Show me all the best articles"
> perspective it's good, from a history "What sort of posts are good"
> persepective, it's not so good though! It perhaps depends on whether the
> table is time-based or not?
Elapsed time (or article age) will be a parameter to that display, yes.
Selectable at view-time, and using some kind of bell curve to weight it.
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New feature: Article rating
|
| (...) Agreed! (...) I think questions should be voted - especially if the answer is wanted by a lot of people, but does that mean that the question post should be voted lower once it has been answered? From a "Show me all the best articles" (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
