Subject:
|
Re: Cleaning up the main homepage
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Mar 2000 02:50:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1153 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Jeremy H. Sproat writes:
> Is LUGNET modular enough to allow many hands in the code?
It really isn't, no. But from time to time there might be things which are
encapsulatable enough to be done independently and worked in afterwards. The
FTX-to-HTML compiler, for example, is fairly encapsulated -- except for the
transclusion portions which slurp in news articles.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Cleaning up the main homepage
|
| (...) Just occurred to me earlier today - someone said it's too bad you can't view links like <set:8880> in the newsreader - then I thought, why can't we put a filter between incoming messages and the news DB to make it possible? basically move the (...) (25 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | quoted-printable encoding
|
| (...) Just thought of something... One thing missing which would be 100% encapsulatable would be a filter to fix up icky encodings like "quoted-printable" (which cause stuff like =F6 and =20 to appear all over the place) into regular non-encoded (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Cleaning up the main homepage
|
| (...) Todd, How open are you towards receiving coding help from the community? I feel that I'd be less useful in helping develop policy, but I can do quite a bit in implementation. Is LUGNET modular enough to allow many hands in the code? Cheers, - (...) (25 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
111 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
