 | | Re: (c) dates
|
| (...) of (...) And that is proper, I think. I am not an IP lawyer but I have encountered this topic before. For works that have been published, then modified and published again in modified form, one asserts the first year of publishing and the (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: (c) dates
|
| (...) LUGNET as an engine and set of rules consitutes a single piece of work, IMO. The message content from LUGNET's customers, of course, are separate entities. Considering that Todd keeps making changes to the rules and code in LUGNET, it could be (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: (c) dates
|
| (...) c /was sometime/will always be sometime/ Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.publish)
| |
