| |
Well. I had come online to make some sort of constructive response to end
all this. But there is no point, as Frank has done all the hard work for me.
All I can say is that I have no intention of breaking any rules again, and
it is still my assertion that I did not intend to break any on Friday. This
is a point that appears to have been accepted by all taking part in this
debate.
Can the filter/ban now please be lifted.... I've just picked up some red &
gray castle walls etc I want to get rid off
Scott A
Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:FptrzL.G26@lugnet.com...
>
> Mike Stanley wrote in message ...
> > You're a smart guy, do what Larry said - agree to NOT be lazy and agree • to
> > keep auction-related stuff only in bst, and agree that should you choose • to
> be
> > lazy and do a bad thing again, you'll accept being banned from bst for • good
> > without complaint.
>
>
> Ok, I've had a night to sleep on my thoughts...
>
> The problem I have with any thought of permanently banning Scott from BST
> (or anyone for that matter) for the next infraction is that Scott's • posting
> is nowhere near the scale of the only individual which a formal process of
> deciding how to handle his posting habits was ignited for. The result of
> that formal process was a probationary period, and that individual has
> elicited a few "you're starting to stray" notices.
>
> I don't know what was going on in Scott's mind when the earlier situation • of
> the repeated wrong posting followed by an apology occurred, but this • current
> situation is nothing at all like that, and in fact, what Scott was
> attempting to do was in general ok, just poorly worded (and perhaps
> erroneously crossposted into lugnet.market.auction).
>
> I don't want to see Lugnet turn into something which would really justify
> the "compartmentalized dorks" post from RTL of a few months ago. I do
> strongly desire posts to be kept in the right place, but lets not go
> ballistic and destroy our community over minor transgressions, when far • more
> serious transgressions happen on a monthly if not more often frequency, • and
> seem to create no major stir.
>
> Frank
>
>
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
110 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
