 | | losing access (was Re: Enough already) —Jeff Thompson
|
| | | (...) to (...) our (...) While I do completely support the right of the owner or administrator of a site to control access to it ... for what it's worth, I'd rather that LUGNET hosts take the power upon themselves to delete posts, rather than to ban (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: losing access (was Re: Enough already) —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | (...) I think it was something along the lines of, if you take it upon yourself to delete posts, you also could be considered repsonsible if you _don't_ delete one that should have been. Which leads top lugnet shutting down, worst case, or even Todd (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: losing access (was Re: Enough already) —Jeff Thompson
|
| | | | (...) The kind of edit I'm thinking about is another form of deletion - excising a passage from a post, with a clear comment from the administrator that it was editedl. I see this as being better than a straight administrator deletion, because it (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: losing access (was Re: Enough already) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | Nephilim wrote in message ... (...) My first inclination would be to agree with the above, but I have heard this issue hashed out before in other venues, by people who show comparable understanding of all the issues as Todd. Two problems with edits (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
