General Discussions about LUGNET : 3646


Administrative / General / 3646	3645 \| 3647

Subject:	Re: Enhanced verification (was: Re: What the F.......)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.admin.general
Date:	Tue, 14 Dec 1999 20:14:58 GMT
Viewed:	176 times

In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes: > > If so does that mean you would be using some sort of temporary cookie? > > No, not unless you wanted to. To clarify: Yes on the cookie, no on the temporary part. Could be temporary or permanent, hence the lack of requirement on it being temporary. --Todd

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Enhanced verification (was: Re: What the F.......)
(...) OK I think I am getting this now. Actually it tripped another synapse :-) and I got another idea that might be bad and it might not. Actually it might even be similar to some of the ideas you have allready mentioned. How about if durring (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Enhanced verification (was: Re: What the F.......)
(...) It would allow Brad to say to the system, "Hey, don't let anyone post to the system using From: Brad Justus <legodirect@lego.com> unless it was actually Brad Justus (as verified by his ID & password). (...) No. (...) No, not unless you wanted (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

7 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search