 | | Re: Does new "lugnet.fun.*" take over for "lugnet.off-topic.fun" ??? —Richard Franks
|
| | | (...) I'm guessing not, as every sub-group of lugnet.fun seems to be on-topic for Lego, where-as just about anything goes in lugnet.off-topic.fun :) Richard (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Does new "lugnet.fun.*" take over for "lugnet.off-topic.fun" ??? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) No, not at all. The two are for very different things. (...) That's right. --Todd (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Does new "lugnet.fun.*" take over for "lugnet.off-topic.fun" ??? —Jeff Thompson
|
| | | | (...) You could refile the rest of the lugnet hierarchy under "fun" as well. =) -- jthompson@esker.com "Float on a river, (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Does new "lugnet.fun.*" take over for "lugnet.off-topic.fun" ??? —Richard Franks
|
| | | | (...) :) That's implied by the "l" in "lugnet" Richard (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
