Subject:
|
Re: Any info on new castles sets?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 18 Oct 1999 05:32:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
118 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.castle, "Mike Timm" <mtimm@usinternet.com> writes:
> > [...]
> > Well that IS kinda part of it, but most of it relates to the following:
> >
> > http://www.lugnet.com/castle/?n=2
<snippage>
> > Anyways, the post that started my involvment is here :^)
> >
> > http://www.lugnet.com/castle/?n=3
>
> Yup, that's right -- it would indeed be a violation of the Terms of Use for
> LUGNET if you disclosed information here which was secret to TLG. Granted,
> it would probably be pretty tough for a TLG-outsider to prove that you
> actually had disclosed a secret, but if do you know something secret, then
> you probably do know that what you know is supposed to be a secret -- so use
> proper discretion.
>
> Engaging in idle speculation or propagating vague rumors or supposed leaks
> heard elsewhere (citing the source as apporpriate) is one thing, and that's
> not specifically against the Terms of Use here, but disclosing actual known
> secret info is definintely "right out." Please don't do that. It makes us
> look bad as a group, and I imagine that it makes TLG very nervous, if not
> more paranoid.
>
> However, anything that's already been released in some catalog in stores is
> fair game, IMHO... (For example, the new TECHNIC Star Wars droid sets
> #8000, #8001, and #8002 for the year 2000 which were just discovered in the
> UK a couple days ago.)
>
> I suppose if you had some burning itch to disclose some secret, you could
> always disclose it in RTL somehow, then wait for someone else to report on
> it here as a heard-rumor, citing the RTL article as a source. But again,
> that just makes us online fanatics look bad as a group (to TLG), and I
> wouldn't really recommend doing anything that makes us look bad as a group.
>
> --Todd
>
> [followups to lugnet.admin.general]
I have no burning desire to get fired (which WOULD be a possibility) and what I
know is some set NAMES and NUMBERS, thats it. No pictures (I wish!)no secret
previews (at least for me!) etc. I haven't had a chance to check and see if
the 8xxx series technic droid are in there or not yet, but I will. They are no
w "available" for my comment, at least if they will be available in the US at a
"major retailer".....
I have a feeling that hte only reson that the info that is in htere is in there
is that its takes time to setup the datbases properly, so the more lead time
the better for the IS/IT people. Not real sure about that last as that is WAY
far away from what I do, and the only time I even remotely connact them is if I
call the help desk and say "our machines are down, HELP!" so they can go beat
on the relevent part of the system... :^)
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
