To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 2605
  CFV Clarifications and REVISIONS
 
Hi everyone, I've finally noticed the concern about this growing so I'd like to throw out some clarifications: (I chose Todd's message to reply to because he seemed to address most of the concerns.) Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: CFV Clarifications and REVISIONS
 
(...) [snipped Adam's explanation] I think I understood his explanation to mean that I read it as he intended. <Tom puts his index finger between his lips and wiggles it up and down> *bbbbbbbb* But still, after reading that my brain hurts! I (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: CFV Clarifications and REVISIONS
 
(...) Wango-Mango, definitely! Greg "Pass me some more o' that ole Wango-Mango spirit.." Majewski citrusx__@yahoo.com (URL) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: CFV Clarifications and REVISIONS
 
(...) If everyone think that a, b, and c are mutually exclusive choices, yes, then it's clearly stated -- except it's not clear whether a would cascade into b; it doesn't specify that. It doesn't specify whether voting for a also implies voting for (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: CFV Clarifications and REVISIONS
 
(...) (25 years ago, 21-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR