 | | Re: Allocation of member #'s —Todd Lehman
| | | | (...) No, that's right. If people get the number they want, that's really great. But if they don't, I don't really care (much). But I *do* care (a lot) that people be given the choice to -avoid- certain numbers that they don't want. That is, I would (...) (26 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Allocation of member #'s —Sanjay D'Souza
| | | | | A far easier numbering system would be to use segments, ie an ID could be made up of subparts that could be used for future Lugnet marketing purposes, give aways and localised promotions. For instance the segments could include: Country of Origin, (...) (26 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Allocation of member #'s —Tom McDonald
| | | | | (...) Thanks for your MasterCard # Sanjay! :D (...) You mean some sort of unique integer based on the attributes of someone's profile? I could see that, but having considered this idea in my only real job- related database project of music involving (...) (26 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | |
