 | | Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more? —Todd Lehman
| | | | (...) OK, I see the confusion now... Sorry for being ambiguous. When I wrote: "Anyway, here are some examples that do seem gray to me and may need careful attention...(these have all been disclosed publicly on LUGNET by their owners)" in: (URL) (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more? —Selçuk Göre
| | | | | Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) unrelated (...) weren't. (...) I've already get it. But the confusing phrase was not this one, it was: "Those are all fun names, of course, and these people could all *certainly* continue to use these (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more? —Todd Lehman
| | | | | (...) Oh. YES, *that* is *really* ambiguous. I see how anyone could read the wrong thing in that. Oops. OK, let me reword that to say what I actually meant to say: "Those are all fun names, of course, and these people could all certainly continue to (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | |
