 | | Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more? —Ed Jones
|
| | | (...) Correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I'm reading above, the Member IDs really serve no purpose other than a system ID, similar to a Unix address. They won't be used as an identifier for posting to news/discussion groups. They will be (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Very well put -- Yes, that's about it! As far as I can imagine right now, they'll only appear in URLs. I'm *sure* there must be some other place that they'll pop up someday down the road, but my crystal ball draws a blank on that one today. (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more? —Ed Jones
|
| | | | | In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes: Uhhh, one us is having server troubles. None of the URLS listed below are working. "The requested URL /people/bobklim/ was not found on this server." (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Heh heh. No, they're not supposed to work; they don't exist. I meant that it boiled down to a choice between *format* A and *format* B, where the two formats were shown by example rather than parameterized. Sorry for the confusion. --Todd (25 years ago, 5-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more? —Ed Jones
|
| | | | | | Ah, got it. Sorry I'm so used to you providing these great sample pages I just automatically clicked on the links. But I do see the delemna with jsut numbers. (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more? —Patricia Schempp
|
| | | | | (...) Yeah! now I'm a pschmep. (sound effects) > schmep schmep schmep. Heheh. sometimes I hate my last name. :) Patricia Schempp pschemp@clemson.edu (25 years ago, 5-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Oops, sorry about that! I guess my fingers automatically typed "...schme..." for some reason. Maybe because there's a William Schmeckpeper in the online LEGO fan world. Anyway, sorry for not paying closer attention... Glad you have a sense of (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more? —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) Actually, I don't see that as much of an issue. As an example, my e-mail address shows up as "galliard@shades-of-night.com", however, the actual POP box I am assigned is "shadesofnight03", which has yet another designation for netnation (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more? —Chris Moseley
|
| | | | | | James Brown wrote (...) Sounds good to me. Moz, Chris, "hey you" and whatever else falls my way (25 years ago, 6-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more? —Greg Majewski
|
| | | | (...) Just a thought, but how about in a chat? If LUGNET had a chatroom down the road, the members would probably use their member name as a screen name. Greg citrusx__@yahoo.com (URL) (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
