To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 2080
2079  |  2081
Subject: 
Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general
Date: 
Sun, 4 Jul 1999 20:01:14 GMT
Reply-To: 
lpieniazek@novera.#ihatespam#com
Viewed: 
1862 times
  
Todd Lehman wrote:

We could do that.  BTW, what do you mean by "appeal"?  Someone recevies a
"didn't pass" message and voluntarily says "Hey, I'd like to appeal that
decision?"

Yes.


That's kind of neat, because, perhaps ultimately cases of appeal become
decided by the community (over discussion or debate somewhere, followed by
a 1/2 or 2/3 majority vote, say) and as such, the voting could provide a
veto mechanism.  That's one way to handle appeals, anyway.

I meant that it would go to a relatively small board, self selected, but
with your veto on membership, that would make the call.
Form-of-Government-wise I'm more of a republican than a democrat(1), I
think putting these questions to the popular vote of the entire
membership will be somewhat unwieldy.

Just make sure I can have lar if we go with character based IDs. :-)

If this style of member-ID's (name-based) is used, you'll surely have no
problem getting "lar".  :-)

You've announced you didn't want to start collating requests.

Posit this scenario. I drop off the net due to hardware problems or
because I can't afford the time to dial in. You announce we're going
with alpha IDs. A week goes by, I'm still not back, and some perfectly
legitimate person (Larry Alfred Reynolds) requests ID lar. The
automation, unschooled in newsgroup lore, grants it as it passes the
test.

I'm now going to be using the ID SOOL because that's what I will be. :-)

So I suggest you recant and accept requests now with the proviso they
may mean nothing if alpha IDs are not allowed, or that they may fail
whatever test is put in place and require an appeal.

This kind of reminds me of the whole domain name precedence thing.

1 - although I am neither, politically. Is there anyone who does not
know what politics I favor? :-)

--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com  http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.

NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more?
 
(...) That makes sense. I have always favored constitutional republics over pure democracies as well. (...) If it's avoidable. (...) I meant, because of all the help you gave last summer and before that and after that, I'll help make sure that you (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more?
 
(...) That sounds like a great idea. (...) We could do that. BTW, what do you mean by "appeal"? Someone recevies a "didn't pass" message and voluntarily says "Hey, I'd like to appeal that decision?" That's kind of neat, because, perhaps ultimately (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)

112 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR